If the authors found errors or inaccuracies after publication, please communicate to the conference support team immediately. The paper perceived plagiarized will be rejected immediately, and it will be retracted by the publisher if the paper is published. Before you begin, we recommend you to detect instances of overlapping and similar text by using cross-check tools such as iThenticate ( ).
#CROSS CHECK ITHENTICATE FULL#
All full papers submitted will be detected by originality detection tool during the editorial process. It must not be under review by any other conference or publication during the review cycle.Īny forms of plagiarism or self-plagiarism is unacceptable. The manuscripts must not be previously published or accepted for publication elsewhere. Please ensure the version of the manuscript to be submitted has been agreed by all authors. Please make sure all individuals who have contribute substantially to the work have been listed as authors. Please ensure that the layout conforms with the abstract / paper template of the conference. Please make sure that English language of the paper should be of sufficient quality to be understood. Please check the spelling and formal style to avoid misspellings or syntactical errors.
![cross check ithenticate cross check ithenticate](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/oupcrosscheckcamoctober2014-141024141748-conversion-gate01/95/crosscheck-powered-by-ithenticate-presented-at-oxford-journals-day-45-638.jpg)
Please make sure that the paper is of interest to the conference. We therefore suggest authors conduct careful self-check before submitting a paper to the conference. Any problems about the submissions, please contact: pre submission self-check is helpful to save time and efforts of authors and reviewers in review process, to some extent it will also help improve quality of submissions.
![cross check ithenticate cross check ithenticate](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/3c974ea4cd013152cb671a9fdeb84937/image-7.jpg)
We have also recently added the ‘We Use Plagiarism Detection’ badge to all of our instructions for authors in a bid to deter authors up-front from submitting work that contains forms of plagiarism.Authors are invited to submit abstract/full paper using the On-line Submission System, please refer to the detailed guideline for online submission system. In such instances, we then assess each instance highlighted in the summary report to determine its significance. The system produces an overall similarity score, which is flagged to our editorial staff if significantly high. In one, 21 of 216 submissions, or almost 10%, had to be rejected because they contained plagiarism in the second journal, that rate was 6% and in the third, 13 of 56 of articles (23%) were rejected after testing, according to Rachael Lammey, a publishing manager at Taylor & Francis’s offices in Abingdon, UK.īy partaking in the CrossCheck initiative, BMJ Group compares all accepted manuscripts to the CrossCheck database using iThenticate. Taylor & Francis has been testing CrossCheck for 6 months on submissions to three of its science journals. Some of the figures from publishers testing the service were perturbing. It is a condition of subscription that publishers deposit their articles into this database, which explains the sheer scale of it. The strength of the service (which uses the iThenticate plagiarism software) is the size of its database of articles, against which other articles are compared. Over the past few years, many publishers (including BMJ Group) have been trialling CrossCheck, a plagiarism checking service launched by CrossRef a non-profit collaboration of 3887 commercial and learned society publishers. The intent and effect of plagiarism is to mislead the reader as to the contributions of the plagiarizer.
![cross check ithenticate cross check ithenticate](http://www.ithenticate.com.cn/news/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/2017091403455377-1-1.jpg)
Plagiarism is the use of others’ published and unpublished ideas or words (or other intellectual property) without attribution or permission, and presenting them as new and original rather than derived from an existing source. The World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) defines plagiarism as:
![cross check ithenticate cross check ithenticate](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1sPfYBeqWZc/mqdefault.jpg)
However, it is still a serious problem and arguably the most common ethical issue afflicting medical writing. Most authors are aware that plagiarism is an unethical publication practice.